Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9211 14
Original file (NR9211 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
- BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
\ ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HCG

Docket No. NR9211-14
15 Jan 15

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

14 January 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7431 Ser N130C/14U1327
dated 9 October 2014, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish
the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this
connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will he
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
within one year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is
evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its
decision in your case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records:
Docket No. NR9211-14

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT J, O'NEILL

Executive Director

Enclosure: OCNO memo 7431 Ser N130C/14U1327 dtd 9 Oct 14

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2086 14

    Original file (NR2086 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR2O086-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3951 14

    Original file (NR3951 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7431 Ser N130C/14U1257 dated 25 September 2014, a COPY of which was sent to you on 10 October 2014; it was returned to sender on 28 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7730 13

    Original file (NR7730 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5250 13

    Original file (NR5250 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NR5250-13 1i March 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4814 13

    Original file (NR4814 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application ‘on 10 March 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser N130C/1300997 dated eres a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7151 13

    Original file (NR7151 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U1016 — a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7669 13

    Original file (NR7669 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and — applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board © considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U1042 dated a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6382 14

    Original file (NR6382 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0406 14

    Original file (NR0406 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser 1130C/14U0650 dated 27 May 2014, a COpy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to gGemonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR746 14

    Original file (NR746 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 duly 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N1i30C/1400651 Gated 27 May 2014, a COpy of which is attached. consequently, when applying for a4 correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.